• Our Next Game Night Is Here! Vote What We Should Play

    Game night is this Thursday at 6pm PT, vote below what we should play and see you there!

    Vote now
  • Welcome To Bounding Into Comics: Introduce Yourself!

    Tell us about yourself! Let us know where you’re from, what you’re interested in (comics, movies, games, etc.), and anything else we should know about you. Looking forward to meeting everyone!

    Introduce Yourself

Darkseid is not the big bad of the DCU. According to James Gunn, there is no single big bad really


In another interview, James Gunn shattered spirits by confirming he isn't trying to replicate the MCU. Apparently, Darkseid is not going to be the ultimate big bad of the MCU after all. Actually, Gunn doesn't think that the franchise needs an ultimate big bad, but I think he is wrong. One of the reasons why the MCU's infinity saga did so well is because everyone knew that every character, and scene across all the films and TV shows were in service of the one ultimate purpose of defeating Thanos.
I do understand the continuity nigtmare that comes with having a single big bad, but it also serves more benefits. If the DCU is to continue as a single unit, it has to have a common enemy for all the heroes to unite around. It doesn't have to be Darkseid but someone needs to be.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Julian Santos-Febus
I see what Gunn’s trying to do, but I’m not sure it’ll land. The “no ultimate villain” approach might give him flexibility, but it also makes it harder to get that sense of stakes across the whole universe. DC heroes feel at their best when they have something massive to fight against together. Without that, it could end up feeling like a bunch of cool moments that don’t really add up to anything.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Julian Santos-Febus
Upvote 0
I’ve enjoyed the majority of Gunn’s work and will give him the benefit of the doubt, but I disagree. Superhero films, particularly MCU films, need villains that don’t feel so disposable. Being dealt with in one film and not living up to fan expectations is always so disappointing. It’s weird that people think Doom will be any different.

It sounds like Gunn has a different plan in mind and it’ll be interesting to see where it all goes.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Billy
Upvote 0
I see what Gunn’s trying to do, but I’m not sure it’ll land. The “no ultimate villain” approach might give him flexibility, but it also makes it harder to get that sense of stakes across the whole universe. DC heroes feel at their best when they have something massive to fight against together. Without that, it could end up feeling like a bunch of cool moments that don’t really add up to anything.
I totally agree with you on that. I don't understand why he won't embrace the fan base and move with them to the next stage kinda like the early days of the MCU? You need a big story with huge stakes and that is where a big bad comes in. Every good story needs one
 
Upvote 0
I’ve enjoyed the majority of Gunn’s work and will give him the benefit of the doubt, but I disagree. Superhero films, particularly MCU films, need villains that don’t feel so disposable. Being dealt with in one film and not living up to fan expectations is always so disappointing. It’s weird that people think Doom will be any different.

It sounds like Gunn has a different plan in mind and it’ll be interesting to see where it all goes.
Well, I'd say Thanos would disagree with you there!
 
Upvote 0