Mark Hamill just admitted the real reason he came back for The Mandalorian: not to ease fans into the de-aged CGI Luke, but to finally give audiences the peak Jedi Master we never got in the Disney sequels.
Hamill slammed the sequels for skipping Luke’s “middle chapter,” saying we saw him begin and end, but never in his prime. He praised Favreau and Filoni for “speaking the same language George did,” and saw The Mandalorian as a chance to do right by the character.
But what do you think? Did Hamill’s return fix Luke’s legacy or was it just a nostalgic patch on a much bigger problem?
Hamill slammed the sequels for skipping Luke’s “middle chapter,” saying we saw him begin and end, but never in his prime. He praised Favreau and Filoni for “speaking the same language George did,” and saw The Mandalorian as a chance to do right by the character.
But what do you think? Did Hamill’s return fix Luke’s legacy or was it just a nostalgic patch on a much bigger problem?